Claims

In middle school, academic-year growth in math was comparable across Catholic and public school sectors

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2026: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In middle school, growth patterns in math were comparable across Catholic and public school sectors, unlike the early-grade pattern. → Dallavis 2021

Evidence

Dallavis 2021

Dallavis, J., Kuhfeld, M., Tarasawa, B., & Ponisciak, S. (2021). Achievement growth in K-8 Catholic schools using NWEA data. Journal of Catholic Education, 24(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.15365/joce.2402012021

q2 · i? · associational · r2

The national K-8 MAP Growth study reports that the early-grade sector difference in growth did not hold for middle school math: "growth patterns in math were comparable across sectors." Comparability across sectors was not statistically tested in the quoted text.

"but in middle school, growth patterns in math were comparable across sectors"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id middle-school-math-growth-comparable-sectors
title In middle school, academic-year growth in math was comparable across Catholic and public school sectors
description In middle school, academic-year growth in math was comparable across Catholic and public school sectors
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
recheck_by 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — dallavis-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.