Engagement peaked at the middle of the Mindsets program and declined slightly by post-test, showing a significant negative quadratic trend¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Across the three time points, engagement showed a significant positive linear trend (b = 1.24) and a significant negative quadratic effect (b = –1.46), peaking at interim. → Gage 2025
Evidence¶
Gage 2025¶
Gage, N. (2025). The impact of the Mindsets mathematics program on student engagement, ability to reason, and repeated reasoning. WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED677579
q2 · i? · design · r2
Three-time-point CLMM on the engagement dataset with ordered time (beginning, middle, end) and random intercepts for classroom and challenge. The linear trend was also significant (b = 1.24, SE = 0.17, z = 7.33, p < .001), and Figure 1 shows "the highest latent engagement at the Interim phase, followed by a moderate drop at post."
"the significant negative quadratic effect (b = –1.46, SE = 0.17, z = –8.59, p < .001) suggests that engagement peaked at Interim and declined slightly by post"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Retrieval latencies increase across successive retrievals from semantic categories, with a significant linear trend and no quadratic trend — related
- Quadratic and cubic trends significantly improved the linear model of teacher and student behavior, showing the importance of studying nonlinearity — a broader claim this one bears on
- Repeated Reasoning (SMP 8) benchmark levels improved linearly across all three time points (d ≈ 0.77) with no significant quadratic trend — related
- Across all three experiments jointly, the interaction between treatment (contrasts versus control) and measurement occasion was significant, with a reliable quadratic trend — related
- Middle school SEL shows normative decline in self-efficacy and self-management but an increase in growth mindset — related
- Ability to Reason (SMP 2) benchmark levels improved linearly across all three time points (d ≈ 0.78) with no significant quadratic trend — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
mindsets-engagement-peaks-midpoint |
title |
Engagement peaked at the middle of the Mindsets program and declined slightly by post-test, showing a significant negative quadratic trend |
description |
Engagement peaked at the middle of the Mindsets program and declined slightly by post-test, showing a significant negative quadratic trend |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — gage-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.