Claims

Quadratic and cubic trends significantly improved the linear model of teacher and student behavior, showing the importance of studying nonlinearity

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2020: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? For both teachers, adding quadratic and/or cubic terms significantly improved the linear regression model of the behavioral time-series. → Pennings 2017

Evidence

Pennings 2017

Pennings, H. J. M. (2017). Using a Complexity Approach to Study the Interpersonal Dynamics in Teacher-Student Interactions: A Case Study of Two Teachers. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 14(2). https://complicityjournal.org doi:10.29173/cmplct29338

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Ordinary least squares regression trend analysis of the two classrooms' time-series (Table 2 reports R2 linear and ΔR2 quadratic and cubic terms with significance markers). The article concludes this "shows the importance of studying the nonlinearity".

"Both for Ethan and Sam, the quadratic and/or the cubic terms significantly improved the linear model. This also shows the importance of studying the nonlinearity."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id quadratic-cubic-trends-improve-linear-model-teacher-behavior
title Quadratic and cubic trends significantly improved the linear model of teacher and student behavior, showing the importance of studying nonlinearity
description Quadratic and cubic trends significantly improved the linear model of teacher and student behavior, showing the importance of studying nonlinearity
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2017
recheck_by 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — pennings-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.