Claims

MIT-based teaching produced significantly higher success-test scores than conventional teaching in 8th-grade visual arts (miniature picture topic)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Experimental students taught with MIT-based activities scored significantly higher on the success test than control students taught conventionally (t=9.12, p<0.05). → Taşpınar and Kaya 2016

Evidence

Taşpınar and Kaya 2016

Şeyda Eraslan Taşpınar, Ali Kaya. (2016). Painting with the Multiple Intelligences: Defining Student Success and Permanence in Art Class. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i7.1684

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental pre/post study with unbiased assignment of two intact 8th-grade classes (experimental n=32, control n=31) at a Turkish secondary school; t test on the 19-item researcher-developed success test showed means of 15.96 versus 10.09, "statistically significant (t=9,12; P<0.05)".

"It is seen from Table 1 that mean success scores of experimental and control groups are X = 15.96 and X = 10.09, respectively. The difference between two groups is statistically significant (t=9,12; P<0.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.