Claims

The common effect of instruction type and group was significantly positive in all six dimensions of attitudes towards statistics

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A mixed-model F-test found the common effect of receiving a different instruction and being in a different group significantly positive in all 6 dimensions of attitudes towards statistics. → Serhat Aydın 2016

Evidence

Serhat Aydın 2016

Serhat Aydın. (2016). Using Excel in Teacher Education for Sustainability. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2016-0017

q2 · i? · causal · r2

General mixed model intercept findings (Table 6) tested the common effect of treatment and cohort using F-tests for mixed measurements; the article reports the effect "significantly positive in all 6 dimensions". Table 6 prints p = .000 for each factor; no effect size is printed.

"Table 5 shows that the common effect of treatment and cohort was found significantly positive in all 6 dimensions of attitudes towards statistics."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.