The common effect of instruction type and group was significantly positive in all six dimensions of attitudes towards statistics¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? A mixed-model F-test found the common effect of receiving a different instruction and being in a different group significantly positive in all 6 dimensions of attitudes towards statistics. → Serhat Aydın 2016
Evidence¶
Serhat Aydın 2016¶
Serhat Aydın. (2016). Using Excel in Teacher Education for Sustainability. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2016-0017
q2 · i? · causal · r2
General mixed model intercept findings (Table 6) tested the common effect of treatment and cohort using F-tests for mixed measurements; the article reports the effect "significantly positive in all 6 dimensions". Table 6 prints p = .000 for each factor; no effect size is printed.
"Table 5 shows that the common effect of treatment and cohort was found significantly positive in all 6 dimensions of attitudes towards statistics."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Excel-based statistics instruction improved pre-service teachers' attitudes towards statistics more than theoretical instruction on all six SATS-36 factors — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Control and experiment groups did not differ significantly in attitudes towards statistics before instruction — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.