Claims

Control and experiment groups did not differ significantly in attitudes towards statistics before instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Pretest t-tests showed no significant difference between control and experiment groups on any of the six attitude factors. → Serhat Aydın 2016

Evidence

Serhat Aydın 2016

Serhat Aydın. (2016). Using Excel in Teacher Education for Sustainability. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2016-0017

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Pretest t-tests for independent samples compared Rasch mean SATS-36 scores of the randomly assigned control and experiment groups before instruction; the article reports no significant difference on the six factors. Equivalence was not tested beyond these comparisons.

"The pretest scores show that there are no significant difference between control and experiment groups in terms of the six factors of attitudes towards mathematics."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.