The mixed model shows the most potential for improving novice programmers' performance¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Nine of the fourteen studies applying the mixed model reported a dramatic improvement in students' performance, suggesting the mixed model may provide more enhancement than other models. → Ali Alammary 2019
Evidence¶
Ali Alammary 2019¶
Ali Alammary. (2019). Blended learning models for introductory programming courses: A systematic review. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221765
q2 · i? · review · r2
Review synthesis across the fourteen studies applying the mixed model. The review hedges that "it seems that the mixed model has the potential of providing even more enhancement"; no effect size is printed.
"it seems that the mixed model has the potential of providing even more enhancement to students' performance. Nine of the fourteen studies that applied the mixed model reported a dramatic improvement in students' performance."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Online-heavy models (flipped, flex, online-practicing) pose challenges for first-year programming students
- The supplemental model risks students skipping online work and course overload
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.