Online-heavy models (flipped, flex, online-practicing) pose challenges for first-year programming students¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? First-year students' attitudes toward online learning can raise challenges when applying the flipped, flex, and online-practicing models, which rely heavily on online activities. → Ali Alammary 2019
Evidence¶
Ali Alammary 2019¶
Ali Alammary. (2019). Blended learning models for introductory programming courses: A systematic review. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221765
q2 · i? · review · r2
Review discussion drawing on included studies: Davenport found students wanted short weekly lectures, and Zampirolli and Goya observed that "freshmen students performed poorly in online activities" under the flex model.
"The attitude of first year programming students toward online learning could raise a challenge when applying the flipped, the flex and the online-practicing models."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The mixed model shows the most potential for improving novice programmers' performance
- Learners reported mostly positive attitudes toward flipped learning in the learner-generated-materials pronunciation course — related
- Students responded with polarised feedback to a redesigned technology-rich active-learning course, with almost a quarter disliking the flipped-video approach — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.