Perceptions of the sustainability of collaboration efforts beyond the grant period were mixed across grantee sites, and some respondents doubted cooperation alone is a viable mechanism for improving school effectiveness¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer1·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Perceptions of the sustainability of collaboration efforts beyond the end of the grant period were mixed across grantee sites, and a handful of respondents across many sites doubted that cooperation alone is a viable mechanism for improving school effectiveness. → Moira McCullough 2016
Evidence¶
Moira McCullough 2016¶
Moira McCullough, Betsy Keating, Luke Heinkel. (2016). District-Charter Collaboration Grant Implementation: Final Findings from Interviews and Site Visits. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/districtcharter-collaboration-grant-implementation-final-findings-from-interviews-and-site-visits
q2 · i? · qualitative · r1
Interview and site-visit findings from the district-charter collaboration grant evaluation. The report states sustainability perceptions "were mixed across grantee sites," and separately reports that a handful of respondents doubted cooperation alone is a viable mechanism for improving school effectiveness. No effect size is reported.
"Perceptions of the sustainability of collaboration efforts beyond the end of the grant period were mixed across grantee sites."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Career coaches strengthened collaboration between colleges and the workforce development system, but sustaining these connections requires additional resources after the grant period — related
- Collaboration spread outside formal grant activities via the observational effect of collaboration in three grantee sites but did not extend beyond the grant in other sites — related
- Cross-sector leadership programs were widely viewed as the most successful collaboration grant activities, while limited grant time period and scope and lack of goal clarity hindered implementation — related
- Several collaboration activities show promise in spreading effective practices, but overall progress in increasing collaboration has been limited — related
- Several collaboration activities show promise in spreading effective practices across schools and staff, but overall progress in increasing collaboration has been limited — related
- Teachers doubted institutionalizing MLE in school documents, and the institutionalization criterion was removed from the final framework — related
- CLASP made limited progress on cooperative activities and little progress on developing replicable collaboration models — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
mixed-sustainability-perceptions-doubts-about-cooperation |
title |
Perceptions of the sustainability of collaboration efforts beyond the grant period were mixed across grantee sites, and some respondents doubted cooperation alone is a viable mechanism for improving school effectiveness |
description |
Perceptions of the sustainability of collaboration efforts beyond the grant period were mixed across grantee sites, and some respondents doubted cooperation alone is a viable mechanism for improving school effectiveness |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2016 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — moira-mccullough-2016 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.