Cross-sector leadership programs were widely viewed as the most successful collaboration grant activities, while limited grant time period and scope and lack of goal clarity hindered implementation¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer?·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Cross-sector leadership programs were widely viewed as the most successful collaboration grant activities, while the grant time period and scope were perceived as too limited to yield widespread impacts and lack of clarity around goals hindered implementation. → Moira McCullough 2016
Evidence¶
Moira McCullough 2016¶
Moira McCullough, Betsy Keating, Luke Heinkel. (2016). District-Charter Collaboration Grant Implementation: Final Findings from Interviews and Site Visits. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/districtcharter-collaboration-grant-implementation-final-findings-from-interviews-and-site-visits
q2 · i? · qualitative · r?
Respondent-perception findings from interviews and site visits across grantee sites in the district-charter collaboration grant evaluation. Leadership programs were "widely viewed as the most successful" activities, while limited time and scope and unclear goals were seen as hindering implementation. No effect size is reported.
"Cross-sector leadership programs were widely viewed as the most successful collaboration grant activities. At the same time, the grant time period and scope were perceived as too limited to yield widespread impacts; lack of clarity around goals also hindered implementation."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Respondents viewed local foundations, businesses, and community groups as promoting cross-sector collaboration, while competition, political divisions, and teachers' unions may hinder it — related
- Compact collaboration activities did not yield systemic change within the grant period but were perceived to have produced small-scale improvements in instructional quality and human capital practices and increased availability of school effectiveness information — related
- Educator grantees in the District-Charter Collaboration Grants cited collaborative work on classroom observation, operations alignment, and curriculum development as particularly helpful to their professional development — related
- School co-locations or partnerships, aspiring-leader programs, and shared Common Core preparation are the most promising avenues for cross-sector collaboration — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Nearly all respondents said inadequate school time and opportunities for collaboration made cross-sector collaboration more difficult — related
- Leaders at city, central office, and school levels are perceived to play a key role in promoting cross-sector collaboration — related
- Cross-sector collaboration is less widespread among school leaders than central office administrators but is particularly strong among participants in grant-funded intensive leadership training or principal residency programs — related
- Limited school staff time is a crucial obstacle impeding cross-sector collaboration — related
- Teacher-level cross-sector collaboration remained low across grantee sites, in part because many collaborative activities targeted school leaders rather than teachers — related
- Time constraints, student attendance, and slow central-office approval of Statements of Work were the major implementation barriers reported by coordinators, principals, and vendors — related
- School leaders developing maker learning programs cite lack of unity around goals, a small research base, lack of academic integration models, and no planning frameworks as key challenges — related
- District leadership testified that the partnership's research deliverables were useful and that the collaboration yielded long-term benefits — related
- Colorado uses a local-first, state-supported model in which districts and local providers initiate cross-sector work and state policy scales successful innovations — related
- Teams that narrowed the first problem and ran small Plan-Do-Study-Act tests before scaling saw themselves as more effective improvers — related
- Close collaboration between principal preparation programs and districts is associated with more coordinated candidate preparation — related
- Cross-sector education partnerships that overcome common challenges are characterized by shared goals, mutually reinforcing activities, and effective communication — related
- Community schools funding availability and consistency strongly impacts continued implementation progress in Roswell — related
- The coordinated school health approach saw scattered US adoption, hindered by pressures on administrators and lack of integration into School Improvement Plans — related
- Most respondents found grant training useful, applied the information in their school, and shared it with others
- Early implementation of the Kauffman Campuses grants was documented through a cross-site analysis of 2005 site visits and a spring 2006 faculty survey — related
- Several collaboration activities show promise in spreading effective practices, but overall progress in increasing collaboration has been limited — related
- Several collaboration activities show promise in spreading effective practices across schools and staff, but overall progress in increasing collaboration has been limited — related
- In its first 3-year grant cycle, 21CSLA served approximately 8,300 California leaders through 333 communities of practice and localized professional learning offerings plus coaching for hundreds of leaders — related
- Perceptions of the sustainability of collaboration efforts beyond the grant period were mixed across grantee sites, and some respondents doubted cooperation alone is a viable mechanism for improving school effectiveness — related
- Strong, consistent early childhood leadership coupled with long-term strategic planning is essential to local preschool system coherence in mixed delivery systems — related
- Leveraging pre-existing networks or hubs may support greater potential for long-term sustainability of cross-sector reform — related
- Intensive training and residency programs for school leaders helped facilitate sharing of best practices, but some schools had not progressed to implementing the shared practices — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
leadership-programs-most-successful-grant-activities |
title |
Cross-sector leadership programs were widely viewed as the most successful collaboration grant activities, while limited grant time period and scope and lack of goal clarity hindered implementation |
description |
Cross-sector leadership programs were widely viewed as the most successful collaboration grant activities, while limited grant time period and scope and lack of goal clarity hindered implementation |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2016 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — moira-mccullough-2016 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.