Mixed responding (individual plus choral) was slightly more effective than choral responding alone in the one study that tested it¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? A mixed response condition (30% individual, 70% choral) produced slightly better outcomes than choral responding alone, and both choral-containing conditions exceeded individual responding only. → MacSuga-Gage 2015

Evidence¶

MacSuga-Gage 2015¶

MacSuga-Gage, A. S., & Simonsen, B. (2015). Examining the Effects of Teacher-Directed Opportunities to Respond on Student Outcomes: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 38(2), 211-240. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1070193

q2 · i? · review · r2

Single-subject alternating-treatments study by Haydon et al. (2010), as summarized by the review; the review reports "mixed responding was slightly more effective" than choral-only, and the finding rests on one study.

"This study found that conditions containing choral response always lead to greater student gains than individual responding only, but that mixed responding was slightly more effective."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Whether individual or peer practice works better with ASR-based pronunciation training is unsettled: one study found individual work best, a meta-analysis found peer practice gave larger effects — related
• Class-wide unison TD-OTRs produce more positive academic and behavioral outcomes than individual TD-OTRs — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• Faster presentation rates of TD-OTRs produced favorable outcomes, with desired outcomes occurring at approximately 3.00-5.00 TD-OTRs per minute — related