Most children did not accept that different rule sets were not cheating, with under 30% judging neither team had cheated¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Only 28.4% of children felt neither team had cheated, and 46.8% thought the red (out-group) team cheated while the yellow (in-group) team did not, indicating the cognitive learning goal was not fully met. → Hall 2014

Evidence¶

Hall 2014¶

Hall, L., Tazzyman, S., Hume, C., Endrass, B., Lim, M.-Y., Hofstede, G., Paiva, A., Andre, E., Kappas, A., & Aylett, R. (2014). Learning to Overcome Cultural Conflict through Engaging with Intelligent Agents in Synthetic Cultures. Int J Artif Intell Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0031-y

q2 · i? · design · r2

Near-transfer EEQ finding from the 144-child evaluation, reported in text describing Fig. 12: "only 28.4 % of children felt that neither team had cheated", with the largest group (46.8%, n=51) attributing cheating to the out-group red team only.

"Figure12 shows only 28.4 % of children felt that neither team had cheated ( n=31). The largest percentage was for the red team (out-group) cheating, and the yellows (in-group) not cheating (46.8 %, n=51)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Children's conflict understanding and resolution learning occurred only when the MIXER interaction was followed by the classroom discussion forum — related
• Children showed high engagement and enjoyment of MIXER, with nearly 90% wanting to use it again — related