Claims

Both mobile learning and control groups held high attitudes toward mobile learning with no significant pre-post differences

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? There were no significant differences between pre-test and post-test attitude scores of either group, and both groups had high attitude scores toward mobile learning. → Kadir DEMIR 2018

Evidence

Kadir DEMIR 2018

Kadir DEMIR, Ercan AKPINAR. (2018). The effect of mobile learning applications on students' academic achievement and attitudes toward mobile learning. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology. http://dx.doi.org/10.17220/mojet.2018.04.004

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Attitude Scale Toward Mobile Learning (45 items, four factors, Cronbach's alpha .950) administered pre, post and at follow-up to both groups; t tests on satisfaction, effect to learning, motivation and usability factors all non-significant (e.g., post-test satisfaction t = -.841, p = .405).

"There were no significant differences between pre-test – post-test attitude scores of both groups. In this case, high results of pre-test and post-test was due to the fact."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.