Claims

Mobile learning produced significantly higher conversational skills ratings than face-to-face learning in the same quasi-experiment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students taught via mobile learning scored significantly higher on the Conversational Skills Rating Scale post-evaluation than face-to-face students. → Abdellah Ibrahim Mohammed Elfeky & Thouqan Saleem Yakoub Masadeh 2016

Evidence

Abdellah Ibrahim Mohammed Elfeky & Thouqan Saleem Yakoub Masadeh 2016

Abdellah Ibrahim Mohammed Elfeky & Thouqan Saleem Yakoub Masadeh. (2016). The Effect of Mobile Learning on Students' Achievement and Conversational Skills. International Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 5, No. 3. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n3p20

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Same 50-student quasi-experiment; conversational skills were rated with Spitzberg's CSRS (25 communicative behaviors plus overall performance ratings, total converted to 20). The article reports a statistically significant difference (α=0.05) in favor of the mobile-learning group, with means of "(M=12.92)" versus "(M=16.16)".

"the T. value for the difference between participants' modified gain ratio in the control group (M=12.92) and the experimental one (M=16.16) regarding the Conversational Rating Scale was (5.71)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.