No significant gender differences in end-activity usability ratings or in within-group maths gains¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? No significant gender difference in any usability rating category. → Fabian 2018
q2 i? No significant gender difference in gain scores within the experimental group. → Fabian 2018 (2)
Evidence¶
Fabian 2018¶
Fabian, K., Topping, K. J., & Barron, I. G. (2018). Using mobile technologies for mathematics: effects on student attitudes and achievement. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9580-3
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Independent t-tests comparing male and female activity and tablet usability ratings in the quasi-experimental study "showed no significant gender difference in all categories".
"An independent t-test of the ratings categorised by gender showed no significant gender difference in all categories."
Fabian 2018 (2)¶
Fabian, K., Topping, K. J., & Barron, I. G. (2018). Using mobile technologies for mathematics: effects on student attitudes and achievement. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9580-3
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Within the experimental group, gain-score t-tests showed "no significant difference in the gain scores", t(22) = -1.567, d = -0.64, though a medium descriptive effect favoured female students; equivalence was not tested.
"There was no significant difference in the gain scores, t(22) = -1.567, d = -0.64 but there was a medium effect size in favour of female students."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Gender — predictor: outcomes differ by group: a gap reflecting circumstances and treatment, not a cause
Related Claims¶
- No statistically significant gender differences in perceived learning outcomes across any dimension among higher vocational students — related
- A significant gender-by-time interaction characterized perceived usability, with marginally significant male-female differences at Lessons 1 and 3 — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
mobile-math-no-gender-differences-ratings-or-gains |
title |
No significant gender differences in end-activity usability ratings or in within-group maths gains |
description |
No significant gender differences in end-activity usability ratings or in within-group maths gains |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — fabian-2018, fabian-2018-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.