Claims

No significant gender differences in end-activity usability ratings or in within-group maths gains

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? No significant gender difference in any usability rating category. → Fabian 2018 q2 i? No significant gender difference in gain scores within the experimental group. → Fabian 2018 (2)

Evidence

Fabian 2018

Fabian, K., Topping, K. J., & Barron, I. G. (2018). Using mobile technologies for mathematics: effects on student attitudes and achievement. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9580-3

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent t-tests comparing male and female activity and tablet usability ratings in the quasi-experimental study "showed no significant gender difference in all categories".

"An independent t-test of the ratings categorised by gender showed no significant gender difference in all categories."

Fabian 2018 (2)

Fabian, K., Topping, K. J., & Barron, I. G. (2018). Using mobile technologies for mathematics: effects on student attitudes and achievement. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9580-3

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Within the experimental group, gain-score t-tests showed "no significant difference in the gain scores", t(22) = -1.567, d = -0.64, though a medium descriptive effect favoured female students; equivalence was not tested.

"There was no significant difference in the gain scores, t(22) = -1.567, d = -0.64 but there was a medium effect size in favour of female students."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id mobile-math-no-gender-differences-ratings-or-gains
title No significant gender differences in end-activity usability ratings or in within-group maths gains
description No significant gender differences in end-activity usability ratings or in within-group maths gains
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — fabian-2018, fabian-2018-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.