Claims

Students rated mobile learning activities positively and 80% gave positive interview feedback

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Design limits · Fabian 2018: no comparison group · Fabian 2018 (2): no comparison group (read from the study by two models, 2026-10-28)

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 80% of interviewed students gave positive feedback, 15% mixed, 5% negative. → Fabian 2018 q2 i? End-activity usability ratings fell mostly in the positive range (2.6-4.8 on a 0-5 scale). → Fabian 2018 (2)

Evidence

Fabian 2018

Fabian, K., Topping, K. J., & Barron, I. G. (2018). Using mobile technologies for mathematics: effects on student attitudes and achievement. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9580-3

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Group interviews with the experimental group (minus two unavailable students) in this mixed-methods study found most students positive; students found tablets fun (n = 11), made learning easier (n = 5), useful (n = 3) and better than usual lessons (n = 3).

"Of that sample, 80% gave positive feedback, 15% gave mixed feedback and just 5% gave negative feedback."

Fabian 2018 (2)

Fabian, K., Topping, K. J., & Barron, I. G. (2018). Using mobile technologies for mathematics: effects on student attitudes and achievement. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9580-3

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive analysis of end-activity evaluation semantic-differential ratings showed "most of the activity ratings fall within the positive ratings with a range between 2.6 and 4.8", indicating majority positive evaluation of the activities.

"From the graph, it can be observed that most of the activity ratings fall within the positive ratings with a range between 2.6 and 4.8."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.