Claims

The model's efficiency index was 76.25% based on achievement scores and 61.67% based on creative thinking scores

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The efficiency index of the mathematics learning management model was 76.25% on achievement and 61.67% on creative thinking. → Sriwongchai 2015

Evidence

Sriwongchai 2015

Sriwongchai, A., Jantharajit, N., & Chookhampaeng, S. (2015). Developing the Mathematics Learning Management Model for Improving Creative Thinking in Thailand. International Education Studies, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n11p77

q2 · i? · design · r3

Phase 3 evaluation of the model's process efficiency using the creative thinking test and mathematics achievement test with experimental and control students before and after implementation. The article prints the two efficiency indices verbatim; no effect size or criterion threshold for the indices is stated.

"the efficient index of the mathematics learning management model based on the achievement score was 76.25%, and the efficient index of the learning management model based on the creative thinking score was 61.67%"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.