Experimental-group students' learning achievement and creative thinking posttest scores were significantly higher than their pretest scores after learning with the model¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Posttest learning achievement of the experimental group was significantly higher than pretest at the .01 level (dependent-samples t-test). → Sriwongchai 2015
q2 i? Posttest creative thinking of the experimental group was significantly higher than pretest at the .01 level (dependent-samples t-test). → Sriwongchai 2015
Evidence¶
Sriwongchai 2015¶
Sriwongchai, A., Jantharajit, N., & Chookhampaeng, S. (2015). Developing the Mathematics Learning Management Model for Improving Creative Thinking in Thailand. International Education Studies, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n11p77
q2 · i? · design · r2
Dependent-samples t-test comparison of pretest and posttest for the 9th-grade experimental group (n = 30 per Table 1) after 30 hours of model-based instruction. Table 1 reports achievement means of 10.43 (pre) and 30.50 (post), t = 33.73, and creativity means of 9.17 (pre) and 24.66 (post), t = 26.59, both significant at the .01 level. The article reports "higher than those of pretest scores at the .01 level of the statistical significance"; no effect size is printed.
"The average posttest scores in learning achievement and creative thinking abilities of the experimental group students were higher than those of pretest scores at the .01 level of the statistical significance"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Creativity — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- The model's efficiency index was 76.25% based on achievement scores and 61.67% based on creative thinking scores — related
- Experimental group's total creativity rose significantly from pre-test to post-test after CREACT practice — related
- A 10-week Enriched Creative Activities Program supported with the Aytürk Technique produced a significant pretest-to-posttest increase in creativity scores of fourth-grade experimental-group students — related
- Year Three students taught angles with Geometer's Sketchpad improved significantly in van Hiele level of geometric thinking from pretest to posttest on all three angle concepts — related
- Twenty-three 5th graders' creativity scores rise after nine CREACT drawing-arts lessons in a one-group pretest-posttest study without a control group (effect size .71) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.