Training combining modeling and performance feedback is associated with larger implementation fidelity effects (β = .77, p = .04)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In meta-regression across all 12 studies, presence of a combination of modeling and performance feedback was the strongest single predictor of effect size, statistically significant and explaining 42.03% of random variance. → Matthew E. Brock and Erik W. Carter 2017
Evidence¶
Matthew E. Brock and Erik W. Carter 2017¶
Matthew E. Brock and Erik W. Carter. (2017). A Meta-Analysis of Educator Training to Improve Implementation of Interventions for Students With Disabilities. Remedial and Special Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516653477
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Meta-regression moderator analysis across all 12 group-design studies, testing predictors identified from the single-case design literature. The modeling-plus-performance-feedback combination was "statistically significant, β = .77, t(10) = 2.24, p = .04" and explained R2 = 42.03% of random variance.
"Presence of a combination of modeling and performance feedback was the strongest single predictor. This combination was statistically significant, β = .77, t(10) = 2.24, p = .04, and it explained a substantial proportion of the random variance in the model (R2 = 42.03%)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- One-to-one coaching format alone is not a statistically significant predictor of training effect size — related
- Educator training improves implementation fidelity of interventions for students with disabilities, with a large mean effect size of g = 1.08 — related
- Performance feedback alone is not a statistically significant predictor of training effect size in group-design studies — related
- Pairing coaching with group trainings is associated with larger effects on instruction and achievement; instructional materials with larger, and video libraries with smaller, effects on instruction — related
- Parent Coaching Outperforms Information Only — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.