Claims

Experimental classes taught with the modeling-methodology task system significantly outperformed control classes on control tests

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Pupils in experimental classes taught with the developed task system showed significantly different (better) test-result distributions than control classes, chi-square = 26.23 exceeding the 7.81 critical value at three degrees of freedom and 95% probability level. → Rakhimzhanova et al. 2015

Evidence

Rakhimzhanova et al. 2015

B. Lyazzat Rakhimzhanova, N. Darazha Issabayeva, Tiyshtik Khakimova & J. Madina Bolyskhanova. (2015). Methodical Approaches to Teaching of Computer Modeling in Computer Science Course. International Education Studies, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n8p166

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental comparison from the training experiment in four Almaty schools (2010-2014); forty test answers were randomly sampled from each of control and experimental classes and compared with the chi-square criterion. The article reports "significant differences in the results of the control test in the experimental and control classes." No effect size is printed.

"Since 26.23>7.81, it is possible to reject th e null hypothesis and assume that there are significant differences in the results of the control test in the experimental and control classes."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.