Experimental classes taught with the modeling-methodology task system significantly outperformed control classes on control tests¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Pupils in experimental classes taught with the developed task system showed significantly different (better) test-result distributions than control classes, chi-square = 26.23 exceeding the 7.81 critical value at three degrees of freedom and 95% probability level. → Rakhimzhanova et al. 2015
Evidence¶
Rakhimzhanova et al. 2015¶
B. Lyazzat Rakhimzhanova, N. Darazha Issabayeva, Tiyshtik Khakimova & J. Madina Bolyskhanova. (2015). Methodical Approaches to Teaching of Computer Modeling in Computer Science Course. International Education Studies, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n8p166
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Quasi-experimental comparison from the training experiment in four Almaty schools (2010-2014); forty test answers were randomly sampled from each of control and experimental classes and compared with the chi-square criterion. The article reports "significant differences in the results of the control test in the experimental and control classes." No effect size is printed.
"Since 26.23>7.81, it is possible to reject th e null hypothesis and assume that there are significant differences in the results of the control test in the experimental and control classes."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.