Students taught with the task-based robotics methodology formed cross-professional competences at a statistically higher level than students taught traditionally¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1–r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? At a significance level of 0.05, the chi-square test led to rejection of the null hypothesis that the experimental and control groups' levels of cross-professional skills were statistically equal, supporting that the experimental group's level was higher. → Soboleva et al. 2018 q2 i? On the control work assessing systems thinking, project management and cross-industry communication, the experimental group earned more excellent and good ratings and fewer unsatisfactory ratings than the control group. → Soboleva et al. 2018 (2)

Evidence¶

Soboleva et al. 2018¶

Elena V. Soboleva, Nikita L. Karavaev, Nadezhda V. Shalaginova, Marina S. Perevozchikova. (2018). Improvement of the Robotics Cross-Cutting Course for Training of Specialists in Professions of the Future. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2018.4.845

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Control stage of the pedagogical experiment: differences in competence formation between control and experimental groups were evaluated with the Pearson chi-square criterion at significance level α = 0.05 with 3 degrees of freedom; the null hypothesis was rejected and the alternative accepted, confirming "the qualitative difference in the level of formation of cross-professional competence". No effect size is printed.

"Thus, the experimental assessment confirms the qualitative difference in the level of formation of cross-professional competence in the control and experimental groups on the example of training specialists of the profession of the future “Medical robot designer”."

Soboleva et al. 2018 (2)¶

Elena V. Soboleva, Nikita L. Karavaev, Nadezhda V. Shalaginova, Marina S. Perevozchikova. (2018). Improvement of the Robotics Cross-Cutting Course for Training of Specialists in Professions of the Future. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2018.4.845

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Forming-stage control work (Table 5): of 100 experimental-group students, 32 received excellent and 40 good ratings, versus 18 excellent and 28 good among 104 control-group students; the control group had more satisfactory (40) and unsatisfactory (18) ratings. Ratings were assigned by criteria for systems thinking, project management and cross-industry communication tasks. Descriptive counts only; no effect size is printed.

"Groups Rating
Excellent Good Satisfactory. Unsatisfactory Experimental group 32 40 18 10 100 Control group 18 28 40 18 104"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Experimental classes taught with the modeling-methodology task system significantly outperformed control classes on control tests — related
• Year 4 pupils taught two-dimensional shape properties with Logo outperformed a traditionally taught control group on the post-test — related
• Undergraduates in a blended learning environment achieved significantly higher self-regulated learning post-test scores than students in two traditionally taught control groups — related
• Undergraduates in a blended learning environment achieved significantly higher self-directed learning post-test scores than students in two traditionally taught control groups — related