Claims

Long video-based modelling examples did not improve diagnostic strategy knowledge, skills, self-efficacy, or cognitive load relative to independently practising in a computer simulation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Apprentices learning with extensive video-based modelling examples showed no greater pretest-to-posttest gains in diagnostic strategy knowledge and skills than apprentices practising the strategy independently in a simulation. → Meier 2024

Evidence

Meier 2024

Meier, J., Hesse, P., Abele, S., Renkl, A., & Glogger-Frey, I. (2024). Better self-explaining backwards or forwards? Prompting self-explanation in video-based modelling examples for learning a diagnostic strategy. Instructional Science, 52, 613–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09651-7

q3 · i? · causal · r2

RM-ANOVA comparing a modelling-examples condition (n = 46) with a control condition solving open problems (n = 21) on repeated measures. The article reports: "this improvement was not larger in the modelling example condition".

"However, there were no interaction effects of example condition and timepoint on these scores. Hence. this improvement was not larger in the modelling example condition."

Meier 2024 (2)

Meier, J., Hesse, P., Abele, S., Renkl, A., & Glogger-Frey, I. (2024). Better self-explaining backwards or forwards? Prompting self-explanation in video-based modelling examples for learning a diagnostic strategy. Instructional Science, 52, 613–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09651-7

q3 · i? · causal · r2

ANOVA on posttest-only measures (second diagnosis, intrinsic, germane, and extraneous load) found no example-condition effects; all printed η2partial values were ≤ .027. The authors state: "we were unable to confirm hypotheses H1 to H3".

"Regarding the variables measured only once, we detected no effects of modelling examples on participants' score on the second diagnosis, nor any effects on participants' ICL, GCL, or ECL."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id modelling-examples-no-effect-complex-diagnostic-strategy
title Long video-based modelling examples did not improve diagnostic strategy knowledge, skills, self-efficacy, or cognitive load relative to independently practising in a computer simulation
description Long video-based modelling examples did not improve diagnostic strategy knowledge, skills, self-efficacy, or cognitive load relative to independently practising in a computer simulation
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — meier-2024, meier-2024-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.