Claims

All participants reported higher teaching self-efficacy after the teaching-simulation training

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? All participants reported higher teaching self-efficacy after the training. → Ke 2021

Evidence

Ke 2021

Ke, F., Dai, Z., Pachman, M. et al. (2021). Exploring multiuser virtual teaching simulation as an alternative learning environment for student instructors. Instr Sci, 49, 831–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09555-4

q3 · i? · causal · r2

In the mixed-method study of 40 university teaching assistants randomly assigned to VR or live classroom simulation, "All participants reported higher teaching self-efficacy after the training." The available text reports no effect size or test statistic for this change.

"All participants reported higher teaching self-efficacy after the training."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id teaching-simulation-training-raises-self-efficacy
title All participants reported higher teaching self-efficacy after the teaching-simulation training
description All participants reported higher teaching self-efficacy after the teaching-simulation training
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — ke-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.