Students showed only modest engagement with GenAI functionalities during in-semester use of the feedback tool¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Usage trace data collected during in-semester use of the GenAI-powered LA feedback tool indicated modest engagement with GenAI. → Jin 2025

Evidence¶

Jin 2025¶

Jin, F. J.-Y., Maheshi, B., Lai, W., Li, Y., Gasevic, D., Chen, G., Charwat, N., Chan, P. W. K., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Gašević, D., & Tsai, Y.-S. (2025). Students' Perceptions of Generative AI-Powered Learning Analytics in the Feedback Process: A Feedback Literacy Perspective. Journal of Learning Analytics, 12(1), 152-168. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2025.8609

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Analysis of usage trace data from students' in-semester use of the GenAI-powered LA feedback tool, triangulated with thematic analysis of perceptions. The trace data "indicated modest engagement with GenAI", contrasting with the positive lab-session perceptions.

"However, trace data from in-semester use indicated modest engagement with GenAI."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• AI-powered predictive analytics improves academic performance by enabling early identification of at-risk students and timely intervention — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
• Student perceptions of GenAI feedback functionalities diverged, with some finding them redundant when feedback was perceived as clear — related
• Reduced engagement with GenAI feedback functionalities was attributed to a mismatch between GenAI outputs and student expectations — related
• In a voluntary pilot of a GenAI practice platform, 34 of 95 registrants attempted at least one question, generating 230 submissions with highly uneven engagement — related
• Review reports the Wikiglass learning analytics tool study shows interplay between teacher and student use of the tool — related
• Interactive dialogue with the AI tool, available only in some sites, promoted deeper engagement and student agency during revision — related
• GenAI Tutor adoption was widespread but usage intensity was highly skewed, with adoption peaking early in the semester while intensity rose steadily — related
• Voluntary StatBot use was highly uneven and deadline-driven, with about 27% of students never using the chatbot — related
• Students initially perceived GenAI explanation features and dashboard visualizations positively in introductory lab sessions — related