Monitoring accuracy score does not moderate the effort–monitoring correlation¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In a supplementary analysis of 26 studies, absolute monitoring accuracy did not affect the effort–monitoring relationship. → Martine Baars & Lisette Wijnia & Anique de Bruin & Fred Paas 2020
Evidence¶
Martine Baars & Lisette Wijnia & Anique de Bruin & Fred Paas 2020¶
Martine Baars & Lisette Wijnia & Anique de Bruin & Fred Paas. (2020). The Relation Between Students' Effort and Monitoring Judgments During Learning: A Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09569-3
q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3
Supplementary meta-regression (footnote 1) of 26 studies found monitoring accuracy score was not a significant moderator (b = .007, z = 0.60, p = .551); the article reports this as a null moderation finding.
"We examined if absolute monitoring accuracy score (0 –100%) moderated the association between effort and monitoring in a sample of 26 studies. The results showed that monitoring accuracy score did not affect the relationship between effort and monitoring judgments, b =. 0 0 7 ,z =0 . 6 0 ,p =. 5 5 1 ."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Absolute monitoring accuracy showed a mixed, inconsistent group-by-time interaction rather than a stable competitiveness difference — related
- Monitoring accuracy in exam score predictions and in key-term definition judgments during the Monitoring Exercise were uncorrelated, suggesting different cues underlie the two measures — related
- Metacognitive monitoring bias during competitive Kahoots did not differ by competitive preference, though bias shifted across time — related
- Thinking aloud does not affect teachers' monitoring accuracy — related
- The relationship between Kahoot performance and quiz scores differed by competitiveness only on the first quiz, and was not replicated later in the semester — related
- Kahoot performance over a semester did not differ between high- and low-competitive undergraduates, though scores varied across time points — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
monitoring-accuracy-no-moderation |
title |
Monitoring accuracy score does not moderate the effort–monitoring correlation |
description |
Monitoring accuracy score does not moderate the effort–monitoring correlation |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — martine-baars-lisette-wijnia-anique-de-bruin-fred-paas-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.