Monitoring tools produce a moderate effect on academic achievement (d = 0.42), supporting a reactivity effect¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r? · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i2 Interventions using monitoring tools yield a moderate effect size on academic achievement (d = 0.42). → Dignath 2023

Evidence¶

Dignath 2023¶

Dignath, C., van Ewijk, R., Perels, F., & Fabriz, S. (2023). Let Learners Monitor the Learning Content and Their Learning Behavior! A Meta-analysis on the Effectiveness of Tools to Foster Monitoring. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09718-4

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r?

Meta-analysis of 32 pre-post control-group intervention studies of monitoring tools (learning journals, rubrics, portfolios), integrating 109 effect sizes with 3492 participants. The pooled effect on academic achievement was "a moderate effect size on academic achievement (d = 0.42)".

"The results of this meta-analysis, integrating 109 effect sizes with 3492 participants from 32 intervention studies, supported a reactivity effect by revealing a moderate effect size on academic achievement (d = 0.42)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Monitoring tools show low effects on self-regulated learning (d = 0.19) — related
• Self Monitoring Improves On Task Behavior — related
• Self-management interventions significantly and positively impact academic outcomes (achievement and work completion) in single-case design studies — related
• Monitoring tools show low effects on learning motivation (d = 0.17) — related