Claims

Monitoring tools show low effects on learning motivation (d = 0.17)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r? · q3 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i0 Monitoring tool interventions yield a low effect on learning motivation (d = 0.17). → Dignath 2023

Evidence

Dignath 2023

Dignath, C., van Ewijk, R., Perels, F., & Fabriz, S. (2023). Let Learners Monitor the Learning Content and Their Learning Behavior! A Meta-analysis on the Effectiveness of Tools to Foster Monitoring. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09718-4

q3 · i0 · quant-synthesis · r?

Same meta-analysis of 32 intervention studies; the motivation outcome pooled 32 effect sizes per the coded study table. The review reports "motivation (d = 0.17)".

"low effects on self-regulated learning (d = 0.19) and motivation (d = 0.17)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id monitoring-tools-motivation-d017
title Monitoring tools show low effects on learning motivation (d = 0.17)
description Monitoring tools show low effects on learning motivation (d = 0.17)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — dignath-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.