Claims

More longitudinal studies are needed to see if the effects are maintained over time.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? More longitudinal studies are needed to see if the effects are maintained over time. → Campos Heidi Hevia 2025

Evidence

Campos Heidi Hevia 2025

Campos Heidi Hevia, da Silva Cinthia Viana Bandeira, Takahashi Juliana, de Almeida Cardoso Marilia Mastrocolla, Mazzachiodi Lily Ríos, Woo Kevin, de Gouveia Santos Vera Lucia Conceição. (2025). Educational Interventions to Improve Knowledge Among Nurses in the Prevention of Skin Tears in Hospitalised Adults and Older Adults: A Scoping Review. International Wound Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.70240

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review concludes that more longitudinal studies are needed to see if the effects are maintained over time. Future research should examine other types of educational interventions and compare which intervention is more accepted by the participants.

"More longitudinal studies are needed to see if the effects are maintained over time. Future research should examine other types of educational interventions and compare which intervention is more accepted by the participants and has a better impact on knowledge acquisition."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.