Claims

Elementary students expressed significantly more opinion statements supporting the other-side when reading the other-side historical account than when reading their own-side account

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Students made significantly more opinion statements supporting the other-side when reading the other-side text (n = 16) than the own-side text (n = 4). → Iordanou 2025

Evidence

Iordanou 2025

Iordanou, K., Fotiou, C., Manoli, A., & Zembylas, M. (2025). Examining myside bias on a controversial historical event after engagement in dialogic argumentation: Insights from a think aloud study. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102209

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Think-aloud study of 30 Greek-Cypriot 6th graders reading authentic own-side and other-side accounts of the 1974 war; opinion statements were coded from think-aloud protocols. The study found "a difference that was statistically significant" in other-side support across texts, with no notable change over time.

"Statements supporting the “other-side” were more prevalent when reading the “other-side” text (n = 16), compared to the “own-side” text (n = 4), a difference that was statistically significant. There was no notable change over time."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id more-other-side-support-reading-other-side-text
title Elementary students expressed significantly more opinion statements supporting the other-side when reading the other-side historical account than when reading their own-side account
description Elementary students expressed significantly more opinion statements supporting the other-side when reading the other-side historical account than when reading their own-side account
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — iordanou-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.