Claims

After the intervention, some students shifted from one-sided to two-sided reasoning: comments against their own side doubled and own-side support halved when reading the other-side text

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · checked against its sources 2026-10-23 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Think-aloud comments against the own-side doubled and statements supporting the own-side decreased by half at post-test when reading the other-side text. → Iordanou 2025 q2 i? Eight pupils showed evidence of shifting from one-sided to two-sided reasoning after the intervention. → Iordanou 2025 (2)

Evidence

Iordanou 2025

Iordanou, K., Fotiou, C., Manoli, A., & Zembylas, M. (2025). Examining myside bias on a controversial historical event after engagement in dialogic argumentation: Insights from a think aloud study. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102209

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Qualitative analysis of opinion-based comments in the think-aloud protocols, discussed in the article's interpretation of students' reflection on their own position when reading the other-side account. Counts are descriptive; no statistical test is reported for this shift.

"the think-aloud comments against the “own-side” doubled, while statements supporting their “own-side” decreased by half in the final assessment compared to the initial assessment."

Iordanou 2025 (2)

Iordanou, K., Fotiou, C., Manoli, A., & Zembylas, M. (2025). Examining myside bias on a controversial historical event after engagement in dialogic argumentation: Insights from a think aloud study. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102209

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Case-study and count-based qualitative analysis: five pupils expressed other-side-supporting opinions at posttest (only one had at pretest) and six expressed opinions against the Greek side at posttest (one at pretest), yielding "a total of 8 pupils" with evidence of a shift.

"In other words, a total of 8 pupils show evidence that they have shifted from one- sided to two-sided reasoning after the intervention."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id shift-to-two-sided-reasoning-after-intervention
title After the intervention, some students shifted from one-sided to two-sided reasoning: comments against their own side doubled and own-side support halved when reading the other-side text
description After the intervention, some students shifted from one-sided to two-sided reasoning: comments against their own side doubled and own-side support halved when reading the other-side text
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2025
source_checked 2026-10-23
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — iordanou-2025, iordanou-2025-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.