After the intervention, some students shifted from one-sided to two-sided reasoning: comments against their own side doubled and own-side support halved when reading the other-side text¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · checked against its sources 2026-10-23 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Think-aloud comments against the own-side doubled and statements supporting the own-side decreased by half at post-test when reading the other-side text. → Iordanou 2025
q2 i? Eight pupils showed evidence of shifting from one-sided to two-sided reasoning after the intervention. → Iordanou 2025 (2)
Evidence¶
Iordanou 2025¶
Iordanou, K., Fotiou, C., Manoli, A., & Zembylas, M. (2025). Examining myside bias on a controversial historical event after engagement in dialogic argumentation: Insights from a think aloud study. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102209
q2 · i? · qualitative · r3
Qualitative analysis of opinion-based comments in the think-aloud protocols, discussed in the article's interpretation of students' reflection on their own position when reading the other-side account. Counts are descriptive; no statistical test is reported for this shift.
"the think-aloud comments against the “own-side” doubled, while statements supporting their “own-side” decreased by half in the final assessment compared to the initial assessment."
Iordanou 2025 (2)¶
Iordanou, K., Fotiou, C., Manoli, A., & Zembylas, M. (2025). Examining myside bias on a controversial historical event after engagement in dialogic argumentation: Insights from a think aloud study. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102209
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Case-study and count-based qualitative analysis: five pupils expressed other-side-supporting opinions at posttest (only one had at pretest) and six expressed opinions against the Greek side at posttest (one at pretest), yielding "a total of 8 pupils" with evidence of a shift.
"In other words, a total of 8 pupils show evidence that they have shifted from one- sided to two-sided reasoning after the intervention."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Critical Thinking — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Students made more evaluative comments after the dialogic argumentation intervention, but their evaluations still favored their own position — related
- Elementary students expressed significantly more opinion statements supporting the other-side when reading the other-side historical account than when reading their own-side account — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
shift-to-two-sided-reasoning-after-intervention |
title |
After the intervention, some students shifted from one-sided to two-sided reasoning: comments against their own side doubled and own-side support halved when reading the other-side text |
description |
After the intervention, some students shifted from one-sided to two-sided reasoning: comments against their own side doubled and own-side support halved when reading the other-side text |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
source_checked |
2026-10-23 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — iordanou-2025, iordanou-2025-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.