Claims

Preliminary evidence from a small number of experimental studies suggests motor skill interventions in primary school settings may positively impact mathematics and/or reading performance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The review's four experimental studies (one cluster randomized controlled trial and three quasi-experimental studies) provide preliminary evidence that school-day motor skill interventions may improve academic performance in mathematics and/or reading. → Macdonald Kirstin 2018

Evidence

Macdonald Kirstin 2018

Macdonald Kirstin, Milne Nikki, Orr Robin, Pope Rodney. (2018). Relationships between Motor Proficiency and Academic Performance in Mathematics and Reading in School-Aged Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081603

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review's critical narrative synthesis of four experimental studies (one cluster randomized controlled trial and three quasi-experimental studies). No effect sizes were printed for this synthesis; the review characterizes the evidence as preliminary and calls for more robust study designs.

"Preliminary evidence from a small number of experimental studies suggests motor skill interventions in primary school settings may have a positive impact on academic performance in mathematics and/or reading."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.