Claims

Total fine motor scores show a significant very weak-to-weak positive association with reading performance, with strong review-level evidence

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i1 All six studies examining total fine motor scores and reading performance reported significant positive associations, five of fair to good quality, with correlations such as r = 0.18–0.23. → Macdonald Kirstin 2018

Evidence

Macdonald Kirstin 2018

Macdonald Kirstin, Milne Nikki, Orr Robin, Pope Rodney. (2018). Relationships between Motor Proficiency and Academic Performance in Mathematics and Reading in School-Aged Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081603

q3 · i1 · review · r3

Review synthesis of six observational studies of total fine motor scores and reading. One study reported "significant very weak to weak positive correlations (r = 0.18–0.23)" between manual dexterity subtest scores and phonemic awareness and word reading; three ECLS-K studies found fine motor skills a very strong and consistent predictor of later reading achievement.

"Overall, summary coding suggests there was a strong level of evidence to support a significant very weak-to-weak positive association between total fine motor scores and reading performance (see Table 2)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.