Claims

Experimental-group students perceived the MPS as increasing interactivity, supporting multimodal-integrated learning, and making instruction more student-centered

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Semi-structured interviews with 11 randomly selected experimental-group students indicated the MPS increased interactivity and active participation, integrated multimedia content, and shifted instruction toward student-centered learning. → Kuo 2013

Evidence

Kuo 2013

Kuo, F.-O., Yu, P.-T., & Hsiao, W.-H. (2013). Develop and evaluate the effects of multimodal presentation system on elementary ESL students. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1018039

q1 · i? · causal · r2

Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 11 randomly selected experimental-group students, with opinions classified into user's state and previous experience, system properties, and usage context. Students reported, for example, that "Operating materials in front of classmates made me feel participating more in class".

"The analysis of students' questionnaires and semi-structured individual interviews showed that the IWB technology enhance students mostly associated with interactivity and active participation (Schmid, 2008, 2010)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.