Claims

Pre-service teachers identified lesson planning and presentation as the assessment task most evaluating their readiness for practice

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Among assessment tasks named by MPTs as evaluating readiness for practice, lesson planning and presentation was most frequent (18 responses, 25.7%), followed by tests (17, 24.3%). → Spangenberg 2025

Evidence

Spangenberg 2025

Spangenberg, E. D. (2025). Constructive alignment of a mathematics methodology module. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09712-z

q2 · i? · design · r2

Experiment-phase survey of 42 MPTs; named assessment tasks were categorized and frequencies converted to percentages (Table 8). "Lesson planning and presentation 18 25.7" led, with tests close behind at 24.3%, and reflection journals and portfolios at 12.9% and 11.4%. Percentages are descriptive.

"Lesson planning and presentation 18 25.7 Tests 17 24.3 Reflection journals 9 12.9 Portfolios 8 11.4"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id mpts-lesson-presentation-top-assessment-task
title Pre-service teachers identified lesson planning and presentation as the assessment task most evaluating their readiness for practice
description Pre-service teachers identified lesson planning and presentation as the assessment task most evaluating their readiness for practice
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — spangenberg-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.