Claims

In a randomized trial, MQI video-based coaching improved teachers' instruction on three MQI domains relative to control

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Teachers who received 1:1 MQI Coaching scored significantly higher than control teachers on Common Core-Aligned Student Practices, Working with Students and Mathematics, and Richness of the Mathematics one year after coaching. → Blazar 2018

Evidence

Blazar 2018

Blazar, D., Gilbert, B., Herlihy, C., & Gogolen, C. (2018). Using tablets to explore the potential for video-based classroom observations for research and professional development. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 6(2), 122-135. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.408935

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Randomized trial of the MQI Coaching model with 142 mathematics teachers (grades 3-8) from two Midwestern districts; 72 assigned to coaching and 70 to control. One year after coaching, videos of five lessons per teacher from a random selection were scored: "significantly higher than control group teachers on three MQI domains". No effect size printed.

"Teachers in the treatment group scored significantly higher than control group teachers on three MQI domains, including Common Core -Aligned Student Practices, Working with Students and Mathematics, and Richness of the Mathematics."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.