Claims

VBC advantage over controls is largest against no-specific-feedback controls and non-significant against controls receiving supplementary training material

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Against controls receiving no specific feedback, VBC showed significantly higher performance scores (SMD 1.58, p = 0.006) and change scores (SMD 1.26, p = 0.004). → Anderson Steven Mark 2025 q3 i2 Against controls receiving individualized feedback alone, VBC showed significantly higher scores (SMD 0.58, p = 0.004) and change scores (SMD 1.08, p < 0.0001). → Anderson Steven Mark 2025 q3 i? Against controls receiving supplementary material such as training videos or lecture slides, differences did not reach statistical significance. → Anderson Steven Mark 2025

Evidence

Anderson Steven Mark 2025

Anderson Steven Mark, Gillanders Sarahlouise, Hickey Anne, Offiah Gozie, Davis Niall. (2025). Video Killed the Radio Star—A Meta‐Analysis on Video‐Based Coaching to Improve Surgical Skill. World Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12494

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r3

Subgroup analysis dividing control arms into three categories: no specific feedback; individualized feedback without video review; and supplementary material such as training videos or lecture slides. The largest advantage was against "controls who received no specific feedback", with effect sizes SMD 1.58 and SMD 1.26.

"Significantly higher mean performance scores (SMD 1.58, 95% CI 0.45, 2.70, and p = 0.006) and mean change scores (SMD 1.26, 95% CI 0.40, 2.11, and p = 0.004) were seen in the VBC compared to controls who received no specific feedback."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.