MT-ITS training was especially effective for distant (250m) moving targets¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? A significant Condition x Distance x Training interaction showed MT-ITS was especially effective for distant targets, and the text reports average hit-rate gains of around 15% for 250m targets versus 3–4% for easy 100m targets. → Vladimir Zotov & Eric Kramkowski 2023

Evidence¶

Vladimir Zotov & Eric Kramkowski 2023¶

Vladimir Zotov & Eric Kramkowski. (2023). Moving-Target Intelligent Tutoring System for Marksmanship Training. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00308-z

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Mixed-factor ANOVA of pre/post sessions in the virtual range experiment (n = 28, fourteen per condition). The three-way interaction was significant; the text adds that "the average gain in hit rates was around 15% (unlike 3–4% for easy-to-hit 100m targets)" in both conditions.

"The significant interaction of Condition x Distance x Training shows that MT-ITS was especially effective for distant targets (250m)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Shooting accuracy was inversely related to target distance and speed, with no effect of direction of movement — related
• MT-ITS training produced significantly stronger pre-to-post gains in shooting accuracy and aiming-lead reduction than standard training — a broader claim this one bears on
• Post-experimental questionnaire ratings favoured MT-ITS numerically but the differences between conditions were not significant — related
• Trial-by-trial performance rose consistently in the MT-ITS condition while Standard-condition training curves stayed mostly flat — related