Multimedia glosses improve EFL students' vocabulary retention two weeks after treatment relative to no glosses¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The gloss group scored significantly higher than the control group on the same vocabulary test administered two weeks after the posttest. → Samah Zakareya Ahmad 2019
Evidence¶
Samah Zakareya Ahmad 2019¶
Samah Zakareya Ahmad. (2019). Multimedia Glosses for Enhancing EFL Students' Vocabulary Acquisition and Retention. English Language Teaching, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n12p46
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Delayed measurement two weeks after the posttest with the same 45 participants; Table 3 reports Sig. 0.004 with mean ranks of 17.48 (control) and 28.77 (experimental). The test was "statistically significant in favor of the experimental group (U=126; p<0.05)"; no effect size is printed.
"the difference between the mean scores of the two groups on the vocabulary delayed measurement was analyzed using Mann-Whitney U-test which showed that this difference was statistically significant in favor of the experimental group (U=126; p<0.05)"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Vocabulary — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Earlier meta-analyses, as reported second-hand, find that glosses improve L2 vocabulary learning and that text-and-picture glosses outperform single-mode glosses — related
- L1 glosses do not significantly improve EFL reading comprehension compared with no glosses — related
- Multimedia glosses improve EFL students' immediate vocabulary acquisition relative to reading the same texts without glosses — related
- The multimedia learning module advantage over the textbook persists on a retention test administered two weeks after the lessons — related
- Vocabulary retention declines between immediate and first delayed recall, then rises slightly between the first and second delayed tests — related
- The advantage of dual coding elucidation for correct lexical usage persists over a four-week delay — related
- Vocabulary knowledge gained from eight encounters persisted over two weeks, with no significant immediate-to-delayed test differences — related
- AI-mediated language instruction produces significantly greater English learning achievement gains than traditional instruction among EFL learners — related
- In Yoshii's study, text + picture glosses beat text-only glosses only on a definition-supply test, with no L1 versus L2 gloss difference — related
- In Lomicka's think-aloud study, no statistical differences emerged among no-gloss, single-gloss, and multiple-gloss groups despite apparent vocabulary gains from multiple annotations — related
- Dual coding elucidation raises adolescent EFL learners' awareness of lexical errors and correct usage more than verbal-only elucidation — related
- Experimental and control groups were equivalent in vocabulary before the glossing treatment — related
- In Chun and Plass's CyberBuch studies, the text + picture annotation group significantly outperformed text-definition and text + video groups on a vocabulary test — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
multimedia-glosses-improve-efl-vocabulary-retention |
title |
Multimedia glosses improve EFL students' vocabulary retention two weeks after treatment relative to no glosses |
description |
Multimedia glosses improve EFL students' vocabulary retention two weeks after treatment relative to no glosses |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — samah-zakareya-ahmad-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.