First-year architecture and civil construction students taught isometric transformations with interactive multimedia lessons scored significantly higher than traditionally taught peers¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? At the Faculty of Architecture, the multimedia group scored significantly higher on the isometric transformations test (86.96 vs 76.56; t = –2.022, p = 0.049). → Marina Milovanoviü 2013 q2 i? At the Faculty of Civil Construction Management, the multimedia group scored significantly higher on the same test (88.12 vs 76.64; t = 2.216, p = 0.031). → Marina Milovanoviü 2013 (2)

Evidence¶

Marina Milovanoviü 2013¶

Marina Milovanoviü, Jasmina Obradoviü, Aleksandar Milajiü. (2013). APPLICATION OF INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA TOOLS IN TEACHING MATHEMATICS – EXAMPLES OF LESSONS FROM GEOMETRY. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1008863

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental comparison of two randomly formed groups of 25 first-year Architecture students, one taught traditionally and one with multimedia lectures, tested after lectures without computers. The multimedia group averaged 86.96 (SD 17.72) versus 76.56 (SD 18.64), and the article reports "multimedia group had significantly higher scores" with t = –2.022, p = 0.049.

"Average score of the Test 1 (isometric transformations) in the traditional group from the Faculty of Architecture was 76.56 with standard deviation 18.64, and in multimedia group, average score was 86.96"

Marina Milovanoviü 2013 (2)¶

Marina Milovanoviü, Jasmina Obradoviü, Aleksandar Milajiü. (2013). APPLICATION OF INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA TOOLS IN TEACHING MATHEMATICS – EXAMPLES OF LESSONS FROM GEOMETRY. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1008863

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Same design at the Faculty of Civil Construction Management: multimedia group averaged 88.12 (SD 18.11) versus 76.64 (SD 18.53), with a reported significant difference (t = 2.216, p = 0.031). Pre-test scores were statistically similar (I: 72.35, II: 71.25 out of 100).

"Average score of the same test in the traditional group from the Faculty of Civil Construction Management was 76.64 with standard deviation 18.53, and in multimedia group, average score was 88.12"

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Geometric Reasoning — outcome: instruction changes it

Related Claims¶

• Students taught regular polyhedra with multimedia lessons scored significantly higher than traditionally taught peers at both faculties — related
• The multimedia advantage was concentrated on tasks demanding visual and spatial comprehension, while scores on definitional tasks were similar between groups — related
• Medical students in an integrated histology course scored significantly higher on the end-of-semester exam than non-participants taught traditionally — related