Claims

Students taught regular polyhedra with multimedia lessons scored significantly higher than traditionally taught peers at both faculties

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? At the Faculty of Architecture, the multimedia group scored significantly higher on the regular polyhedra test (85.20 vs 72.64; t = 3.508, p = 0.001). → Marina Milovanoviü 2013 q2 i? At the Faculty of Civil Construction Management, the multimedia group scored significantly higher on the same test (86.80 vs 75.80; t = –2.601, p = 0.002). → Marina Milovanoviü 2013 (2)

Evidence

Marina Milovanoviü 2013

Marina Milovanoviü, Jasmina Obradoviü, Aleksandar Milajiü. (2013). APPLICATION OF INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA TOOLS IN TEACHING MATHEMATICS – EXAMPLES OF LESSONS FROM GEOMETRY. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1008863

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Post-test comparison for regular polyhedra at the Faculty of Architecture: multimedia group averaged 85.20 (SD 13.11) versus 72.64 (SD 12.19), reported as significantly higher with t = 3.508, p = 0.001.

"Average score of the Test 2 (regular polyhedra) in the traditional group from the Faculty of Architecture was 72.64 with standard deviation 12.19, and in multimedia group, average score was 85.20"

Marina Milovanoviü 2013 (2)

Marina Milovanoviü, Jasmina Obradoviü, Aleksandar Milajiü. (2013). APPLICATION OF INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA TOOLS IN TEACHING MATHEMATICS – EXAMPLES OF LESSONS FROM GEOMETRY. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1008863

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Same test at the Faculty of Civil Construction Management: multimedia group averaged 86.80 (SD 14.28) versus 75.80 (SD 15.59), reported as significantly higher with t = –2.601, p = 0.002.

"Average score of the same test in the traditional group from the Faculty of Civil Construction Management was 75.80 with standard deviation 15.59, and in multimedia group, average score was 86.80"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.