The author reports clear evidence that multimedia application supported vocabulary acquisition development among Chinese EFL learners over one semester¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? After one semester with 80 participants, the study reports clear evidence of the multimedia application's effectiveness for vocabulary acquisition development. → Shao 2012
Evidence¶
Shao 2012¶
Jing Shao. (2012). A Study of Multimedia Application-based Vocabulary Acquisition. English Language Teaching, 5(10). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n10p202
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Quasi-experimental study with two parallel classes of 40 freshmen each, assigned by entrance-examination scores to multimedia-based versus traditional vocabulary instruction for one semester. The author reports the result as encouraging with "clear evidences showing the effectiveness"; no test statistics or effect sizes are printed in the text.
"An experimental study of multimedia application was implemented with 80 participants for about one semester. After qualitative and quantitative data analysis, we found the result of the study is encouraging."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Chinese college EFL learners held strongly favorable attitudes toward a multimedia vocabulary application, with more than 80% reacting positively — related
- Multimedia glosses improve EFL students' vocabulary retention two weeks after treatment relative to no glosses — related
- Multimedia glosses improve EFL students' immediate vocabulary acquisition relative to reading the same texts without glosses — related
- 80% of students did not agree to integrate multimedia-based vocabulary instruction into their curriculum despite its reported effectiveness — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.