Using multiple data sources, including site-specific data, helped schools develop a more comprehensive understanding of their school climate¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer?·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Schools that supplemented districtwide climate surveys with focus groups, engagement data, behavior referrals, and site-specific surveys gained a more comprehensive and holistic understanding of their environments. → Klevan 2024
Evidence¶
Klevan 2024¶
Klevan, S., Leung-Gagné, M., & Nakajima, T. M. (2024). Using data to improve school climate: Insights from three California schools. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/918.411
q2 · i? · qualitative · r?
Cross-case finding from a qualitative multi-case study of three California middle schools, based on interviews, focus groups, and document review. The report states that "Drawing on varied sources of data allowed schools to develop a more comprehensive and holistic understanding of their environments."
"Each of the schools in this study supplemented large-scale districtwide climate surveys with additional data sources, such as student focus groups, student engagement data, behavior referral data, and site-specific surveys, to inform their climate improvement strategies. Drawing on varied sources of data allowed schools to develop a more comprehensive and holistic understanding of their environments."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Experts report reduced suspensions and expulsions and improved school climate as RJ implementation successes — related
- Parent focus groups showed parents could not report on specific classroom instructional interactions, so ambitious instruction items were developed for the teacher survey instead, and a new Teacher Care and Responsiveness towards Parents measure was created — related
- Survey design and management conditions influenced how schools engaged with climate data — related
- Focal math teachers relied primarily on their own observations of student behavior to understand students' feelings about math, supplemented by surveys, with disaggregated data rare — related
- School climate measurement relies heavily on student self-report questionnaires, with families and observational methods rarely represented — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
multiple-data-sources-holistic-climate-understanding |
title |
Using multiple data sources, including site-specific data, helped schools develop a more comprehensive understanding of their school climate |
description |
Using multiple data sources, including site-specific data, helped schools develop a more comprehensive understanding of their school climate |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — klevan-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.