Claims

Teamwork training showed significant effects on teamwork behaviors when two or more teamwork dimensions were targeted, but not when only one was

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Significant effects on teamwork emerged when two or more dimensions were targeted (ds = 0.65–0.98) but not when only one dimension was targeted (d = 0.05). → McEwan D. 2017

Evidence

McEwan D. 2017

McEwan D., Ruissen G.R., Eys M.A., Zumbo B.D., Beauchamp M.R. (2017). The Effectiveness of Teamwork Training on Teamwork Behaviors and Team Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Interventions. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169604

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Moderator analysis (Table 3) of the number of teamwork dimensions targeted in the teamwork pool: one dimension d = 0.05 (k = 6, 95% CI −0.26 to 0.35, p = .775, not significant); two d = 0.65, three d = 0.98, four d = 0.57, all significant. The one-dimension result is a non-significant pooled estimate, not evidence that single-dimension training has no effect. Team performance improved regardless of number of dimensions (ds = 0.46–0.67).

"significant effects of training on teamwork were evident when two or more dimensions of teamwork were targeted (ds = 0.65–0.98) but not when only one dimension was targeted (d = 0.05)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.