Workshop, simulation, and team-review methods significantly improve teamwork behaviors, while the pooled effect of didactic education alone was not significant¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Significant effects on teamwork were found for workshop training (d = 0.50), simulation-based training (d = 0.78), and team reviews (d = 0.64), but not for didactic education (d = 0.19). → McEwan D. 2017
Evidence¶
McEwan D. 2017¶
McEwan D., Ruissen G.R., Eys M.A., Zumbo B.D., Beauchamp M.R. (2017). The Effectiveness of Teamwork Training on Teamwork Behaviors and Team Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Interventions. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169604
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3
Moderator analysis (Table 3) of training method in the teamwork pool: workshop d = 0.50, simulation d = 0.78, team reviews d = 0.64 all significant; didactic education d = 0.19 (k = 4, 95% CI −0.20 to 0.57, p = .341) was not significant, which does not show it has no effect. All four methods were effective for team performance (ds = 0.41–0.69).
"with regard to the intervention method utilized, significant effects on teamwork were found for workshop training (d = 0.50), simulation-based teamwork training (d = 0.78), and team reviews (d = 0.64) but not for didactic education (d = 0.19)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Collaboration — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- HF simulation shows no significant benefit for satisfaction, confidence, or teamwork behaviors, and no long-term knowledge retention benefit — reports the opposite
- Comparative ISBTT studies suggest simulation added to training improves collaborative behaviors, with mixed results for modality and interprofessional versus uniprofessional comparisons — related
- Condensed TeamSTEPPS training coupled with simulation exercises reduced weighted adverse outcome scores, whereas training alone did not — related
- Adding simulation to online patient-safety training improved nursing students' patient safety competency, but adding classroom teaching to clinical simulation did not further improve teamwork attitudes — related
- NTS training programs in ICUs are associated with improved teamwork, situational awareness, leadership and communication behaviors, with varying evidence certainty — related
- Teamwork training interventions produce significant positive effects on team performance in controlled studies — a broader claim this one bears on
- Team training programs in hospitals produce sustained improvements in teamwork knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors on the job, up to 12 months after training — related
- Long-term retention of high-fidelity simulation benefits is controversial: one RCT found no difference at 3 months while another found improvement after a median of 107 days — related
- Teamwork training showed significant effects on teamwork behaviors when two or more teamwork dimensions were targeted, but not when only one was — related
- Teamwork training effects on teamwork are larger for new teams, but effects on team performance are larger for intact teams — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.