Claims

Narrative medicine education improves residents' humanistic care ability and doctor-patient communication compared with lecture-based learning

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Narrative medicine education was associated with improved humanistic care ability (SMD = 2.62, 95% CI 0.26 to 4.99, P = 0.03). → Dai Dongjun 2026 q3 i3 Narrative medicine education was associated with improved doctor-patient communication (SMD = 2.19, 95% CI 0.21 to 4.17, P = 0.03). → Dai Dongjun 2026 (2)

Evidence

Dai Dongjun 2026

Dai Dongjun, Fan Yuzhi, Zhang Wenbao, Wei Qichun. (2026). The effect of narrative medicine-based education on academic performance and humanistic communication in residency training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-53552-x

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r2

Random-effects meta-analysis of 3 randomized controlled studies (128 vs 128 residents), humanistic care ability mainly measured with the Caring Ability Inventory or Mini-CEX. The pooled effect size SMD = 2.62 (95% CI 0.26 to 4.99) was significant with very high heterogeneity (I2 = 96.6%).

"narrative medicine education was associated with improved humanistic care ability (3 studies with 128 residents in narrative medicine group and 128 in LBL group, SMD = 2.62, 95% CI 0.26 to 4.99, P = 0.03; I2 = 96.6%)"

Dai Dongjun 2026 (2)

Dai Dongjun, Fan Yuzhi, Zhang Wenbao, Wei Qichun. (2026). The effect of narrative medicine-based education on academic performance and humanistic communication in residency training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-53552-x

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r2

Random-effects meta-analysis of 7 randomized controlled studies (197 vs 196 residents), communication predominantly measured by the SEGUE framework. The pooled effect size SMD = 2.19 (95% CI 0.21 to 4.17) was significant with very high heterogeneity (I2 = 94.3%).

"and doctor-patient communication (7 studies with 197 residents in narrative medicine group and 196 in LBL group, SMD = 2.19, 95% CI 0.21 to 4.17, P = 0.03; I2 = 94.3%)"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.