Claims

Residents report higher satisfaction with narrative medicine education than lecture-based learning, but the effect is not robust to publication-bias adjustment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Residents were more satisfied with narrative medicine education than LBL (OR = 6.67, 95% CI 1.74 to 25.51), but after trim-and-fill adjustment the difference was no longer significant (P = 0.053). → Dai Dongjun 2026

Evidence

Dai Dongjun 2026

Dai Dongjun, Fan Yuzhi, Zhang Wenbao, Wei Qichun. (2026). The effect of narrative medicine-based education on academic performance and humanistic communication in residency training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-53552-x

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r2

Random-effects meta-analysis of 6 randomized controlled studies (192 vs 192 residents) reporting resident satisfaction as a binary outcome. The pooled effect size OR = 6.67 (95% CI 1.74 to 25.51) was significant (P < 0.001) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 50.9%).

"residents were more satisfied with the narrative medicine education than LBL (6 studies with 192 residents in narrative medicine group and 192 in LBL group, odds ratio [OR] = 6.67, 95% CI 1.74 to 25.51, P < 0.001; I2 = 50.9%, Supplementary Fig. 3)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.