Claims

Ultimate attainment and optimal-period length do not reliably differ across major native-language groups, with slightly more evidence for differences in learning curves

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Differences in ultimate attainment across Uralic, Slavic, West Germanic, Romance, and Chinese language groups were small and generally not reliable, with analyses favoring the null. → Hartshorne Joshua K. 2018 q2 i? There was slightly more evidence for differences in learning curves, with simultaneous English-Chinese speakers distinguishable from the rest. → Hartshorne Joshua K. 2018 (2)

Evidence

Hartshorne Joshua K. 2018

Hartshorne Joshua K., Tenenbaum Joshua B., Pinker Steven. (2018). A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers. Cognition. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6559801/

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Bayes Factor model comparison (BIC approximation) of ultimate attainment across five language groups among learners with at least 30 years of experience. Differences were "small ... and generally not reliable", favoring the null.

"In fact, the differences across language groups were small (see Fig. S14) and generally not reliable. In most cases, analyses favored the null hypothesis (no difference between the target language and the other languages)"

Hartshorne Joshua K. 2018 (2)

Hartshorne Joshua K., Tenenbaum Joshua B., Pinker Steven. (2018). A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers. Cognition. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6559801/

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Same Bayes Factor comparison applied to learning-curve shape. The authors report "slightly more evidence for differences in learning curves", with simultaneous English-Chinese speakers distinguishable from the rest.

"We found slightly more evidence for differences in learning curves. In particular, simultaneous English-Chinese speakers could be distinguished from the rest"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id native-language-group-differences-small-unreliable
title Ultimate attainment and optimal-period length do not reliably differ across major native-language groups, with slightly more evidence for differences in learning curves
description Ultimate attainment and optimal-period length do not reliably differ across major native-language groups, with slightly more evidence for differences in learning curves
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — hartshorne-joshua-k-2018, hartshorne-joshua-k-2018-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.