Claims

The information-content modulation of Error Negativity during synchronization disappears in reproduction trials, where only repetition and asynchrony modulate Ne

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In reproduction trials Ne was modulated by asynchrony (F(1,51298) = 7.05, p < 0.01) and repetition (F(1,51274) = 4.30, p = 0.04), with no statistically significant group differences. → Marc Deosdad-Díez & Josep Marco-Pallarés 2025

Evidence

Marc Deosdad-Díez & Josep Marco-Pallarés 2025

Marc Deosdad-Díez & Josep Marco-Pallarés. (2025). Note-by-note predictability modulates rhythm learning and its neural components. npj Science of Learning 10:59. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00353-y

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Reproduction-trial Ne LMM in which the component "was modulated by asynchrony (F(1,51298) = 7.05, p < 0.01) and repetition" with no significant group differences for asynchrony or repetition; the authors state the IC modulation seen during synchronization disappears in these trials without auditory feedback.

"the Ne component (Supplementary Table 5, Fig. 3b, conditionalR2 = 0.02, marginalR2 of 0.002) was modulated by asynchrony (F(1,51298) = 7.05, p < 0.01) and repetition (F(1,51274) = 4.30, p =0 . 0 4 )."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.