Claims

Groups reacted to the large majority of monitoring events, but negative-valence monitoring of motivation or emotion received the lowest reaction rate

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1 · q1–q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A reaction followed 84.5% of all monitoring events, and negative-valence monitoring of motivation or emotion was followed by a reaction least often (57.14% of such events). → Sobocinski 2020

Evidence

Sobocinski 2020

Sobocinski, M., Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., Dindar, M., Isosalo, A., & Noponen, K. (2020). How does monitoring set the stage for adaptive regulation or maladaptive behavior in collaborative learning? Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09224-w

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Reaction coding of the 463 monitoring events from the nine-group collaborative exam showed "A reaction from the group followed 84.5% of all monitoring events." Table 6 reports monitoring emotion and motivation with negative valence drew a reaction in 57.14% of cases.

"A reaction from the group followed 84.5% of all monitoring events."

Sobocinski 2020 (2)

Sobocinski, M., Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., Dindar, M., Isosalo, A., & Noponen, K. (2020). How does monitoring set the stage for adaptive regulation or maladaptive behavior in collaborative learning? Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09224-w

q1 · i? · associational · r1

The authors' interpretation in the Discussion: "this type of monitoring with negative valence had the lowest reaction rate," consistent with Table 6 percentages for negative motivation/emotion monitoring.

"Although monitoring motivation or emotion were scarce in the data, it is notable that this type of monitoring with negative valence had the lowest reaction rate."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id negative-motivation-emotion-monitoring-lowest-reaction-rate
title Groups reacted to the large majority of monitoring events, but negative-valence monitoring of motivation or emotion received the lowest reaction rate
description Groups reacted to the large majority of monitoring events, but negative-valence monitoring of motivation or emotion received the lowest reaction rate
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — sobocinski-2020, sobocinski-2020-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.