Claims

Leaders report negative perceptions of technology centring on poor interoperability, data availability problems, and resource limitations

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Qualitative synthesis found leaders experienced negative usability and accessibility issues, including poor system interoperability, data inaccessibility, and insufficient resources. → Laakkonen Noora 2024

Evidence

Laakkonen Noora 2024

Laakkonen Noora, Jarva Erika, Hammarén Mira, Kanste Outi, Kääriäinen Maria, Oikarinen Anne, Mikkonen Kristina. (2024). Digital Competence among Healthcare Leaders: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. Journal of Nursing Management. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8435248

q2 · i? · review · r3

Content analysis of qualitative studies in the review, drawing on Wong et al.; leaders reported challenges using data for staffing management, including lack of software harmonisation and data system configurations delaying responses to events.

"In their study, leaders perceived the lack of intraorganizational harmonisation in software usage as a challenge in using data to guide inpatient staffing management decisions. They also saw that data system configurations challenged the timely addressing of events."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.